Current Events Discussion for Week 3 Class (Sep 8)
Becca has been kind enough to lead this week's current events discussion. I know that we are all looking forward to reading an interesting news article this week!
2. Cuts Intensify Identity Crisis for Washington's Flagship Campus
"Washington's flagship university doesn't look like it has money problems. The picturesque campus, a blend of Gothic architecture and the lush greenery of the Pacific Northwest, draws more federal research dollars than any other public university in the country. And the University of Washington raised $2.7-billion in a recent campaign from its perch in this entrepreneurial city.
But cracks are appearing under the surface. The state is not paying for the many construction projects here, and severe budget cuts are now threatening quality at the university, particularly for undergraduates who are coping with larger classes and fewer research opportunities, one of the institution's core strengths."
"Sex-toy raffles and giveaways? Workshops featuring graphic, violent pornography and simulated sex techniques? Teaching about polyamory but not about monogamy or abstinence?
All those events have transpired recently on campuses across the country—perhaps unbeknownst to many parents, alumni, and even professors. As the word gets out about such controversial programs, university administrators must decide what kinds of sex-education programs should be offered to their students, and who should be teaching them."
It's not any big surprise that sex is an extremely taboo subject more so now in the new millennia with our nations shift back to a more conservative stance. I must say I am also not surprised that there has been an outbreak of these types of events. If you censor something like sex, it won't be unknown to students they will just have to go to extremes to get the information they want. So on the campuses where the students aren't getting the information they want/need about sex from administrators and campus programs they will go to the extremes such as they "Sex toy events".
I believe it is vital that college administrators take a strong stance with this and offer the campus programs educating about sex. Obviously its what the students want and if the administration offers it they can control the information flow and insure that the information the students are receiving is accurate. They could ensure that there is strong educational background in the programs such as information about sex-trafficking awareness, safe sex information, etc.
E-Books have been the craze of the past year and just like the article said, the iPad has been the “most buzzed” about. I actually go back and forth on this topic. I own a Sony eReader and when I purchased it I loved it. When I was traveling I was doing a lot of reading and the convenience of having all of my books in one device was great. Even though electronic books are a convenience I still like to feel the weight of the book, be able to turn a real page, and be able to briefly skim to see how far I have to go until I reach the next chapter.
Just like the way I feel about my personal reading preferences, I think the same rings true for educational textbooks. There are pros and cons to each. The pros are easy to see. Students would be a lot happier if they can lessen the weight in their backpacks by only carrying one piece of equipment instead of 4 heavy textbooks. The electronics editions of the books would also be cheaper because they would be on a rental basis giving the students more money in their pocket. The fact that it is also new technology drives this generation crazy. Depending on the student they might not even look at the some of the outweighing cons. The books are only a rental basis, which means the books would disappear after a couple semesters. This doesn’t benefit the student that would like to keep their books for their major to use later in their careers (such as our CSA books). Being able to mark in the books by highlighting and making your own notes are doable on such devices, but it is not the same as if you were doing so in a regular textbook.
Many different Universities and Colleges are experiencing an increase in budget cuts from their states. This has been a continuing problem and seems to be getting worse. I have been reading a lot about this topic lately because conveniently it was one of the main topics in Dr. Conway’s readings from our book. In the book many researcher’s stated that the budget cuts have been harming multiple institutions. Several colleges have had to cut back and hire low salary teaching assistants for introductory classes. Also, all the introductory classes at big colleges have more than 100 students in them. The quality of learning is starting to decrease due to these budget cuts. I know from my personal experience I was taught by more teaching assistants than actual professors. The only time I had professors as my teachers was when I got into my actual major classes, which was not until my third year at school.
I also thought it was interesting that the article “Cuts Intensify Identity Crisis for Washington’s Flagship Campus” stated that many public universities are choosing to privatize because of the lack of money they are receiving. I didn’t realize that this was happening so frequently. In my opinion this is a bad idea because if schools keep deciding to privatize many people will not be able to afford to go to college with the huge increase in tuition and other expenses.
In the Ebooks article, Joseph Esposito says “We shouldn’t be dismissive of incremental gains by digital text...but we shouldn’t be looking for revolutionary gains.” I have to agree. Technology is great, but it does malfunction. A paper text book, hmmm not so much.
We have all these technological advances but the generation gap between most professors and students is significant. How would class go over if students were on their Ipads while professors were lecturing? Would it be a distraction for someone without one? Some students learn best by re-writing things, jotting down a key word, underlining it multiple times. I'm not sure that E-books would satisfy those needs.
Also,I remember buy back week at the book store and let me tell you, getting $30 back on a book you paid $70 for at the end of the semester was/is a big deal! Now, I use Amazon prime to order my text books, if you use a student email account you get free shipping on all Amazon Prime purchases.
What's the motivation in all of this sustainability or money? Or both?
The ebooks article interesting. I have been debating about the purchase of an ereader for quite some time, but I, like Justin mentioned, enjoy holding a real book, flipping a page, and adding that book to my collection (not that I do anything with those books besides let them collect dust). For an educational book I couldn't imagine not being able to mark, write, hi-lite, etc., as I read or as my professor lectures. I also know that my phone dies on my at the most inconvenient times. How many of use would like our ereader to die in the middle of cramming for an exam or in the middle of a chapter with no outlet available to plug in to? I do believe that cost will be the prime motivating factor when purchasing a book.
The "Sex Week" article was news to me, although I did overhear a UE teacher mention something about possibly having a "Safer Sex" class at some point this semester. Not sure if this is what he was referring to but I can only imagine the response of some parents if these topics were introduced to their new college student during a mandated university course.
On a completely other note, I did find an article on CNN while reading news today regarding the topic that Jeff brought up about for-profit universities and problems with their degrees when going to another institution. Definitely interesting! http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/09/02/for.profit.college.debt/index.html
Wow, that "sex week" article was something else! I can understand the desire of students to put on events about different sexual topics but porn actors and actresses showing how to use different sex toys seems a bit much. The funny thing to me was this stuff is happening at Brown and Northwestern. While I do not personally find these things offensive, I am defintely surprised that these events would be allowed at such high profile academic institutions.
E-Books? Can we not turn an actual page now? I thought the world was coming to an end with I-phones. Do we really need the weather forecast while checking the score of the game and getting directions to your buddy's house? I appreciate that this technology exists and enables people to do incredible things but one of the last true american activities is reading a book. I know it is taxing (sarcasm) but I think we can all muscle our way through those heavy pages. Like Brent said, there is something fulfilling about having a tangible item to pick up and read, then add to your dusty archives never to be seen again :)
That was a really interesting article Brent! Another example of how imperative it is to educate incoming students on financial literacy (prevention over intervention!).
Megan, I also didn’t realize the dilemma many flagship and public schools are facing, leaving them to choose between going private or decreasing in quality. In my experience at a private institution, you didn’t see student groups or offices able to throw out a free t-shirt at every event, but there were no signs that funding was lacking. DePaul actually released a very detailed plan to expand its campus the year I graduated. Of course, I am still paying them, and they are already asking for generous alumni donations…
“‘Sex Week' Should Arouse Caution Most of All,” definitely struck me as surprising for the same reason Aaron said, that such events were held at very high profile institutions. I couldn’t help but scroll down to the end of the article to see what some reactions were, and they aren’t pretty. It is obviously a very controversial topic, but from a student affairs perspective, I think such events do need to have some administration regulation, especially if the university’s name is attached to them.
As far as ebooks and ipad's go I have to go ahead and disagree with all the negativity. I have also been pondering the idea of getting an ipad for quite sometime. I do agree with Brent that from an educational standpoint I cannot imagine not being able to highlight thinks in my books. But I'm sure there is a way to highlight in those things.
However, I was really excited to see that USF had the option to purchase them for the nook. If they had the option for the ipad, I probably would have considered buying them. Only for the following reason. CONVENIENCE. We are going to need these books in our professional careers, so we most likely will not be selling them back at the end of the semester. Thinking about what a pain it is to move, why would you want to add another box of stuff to the pile? Especially when all of the information can be stored on a computerized device. You will then be able to reference the book quickly and easily from the ebook.
Also, the ipad and nook are small and light devices. They can just be thrown into your purse (or backpack for men) and do not take up room around your house year after year to collect dust. I personally really like the idea of not lugging a million things around campus and feeling like my shoulder is going to break off.
Regarding the ebook article, I thought it was interesting that the author primarily attributed its lagging popularity to cost but our comments are more concerned about the physical characteristics of printed books (physical paper pages, weight, longevity). I also am not a huge fan of ebooks. I think that one of the most basic issues with ebook readers is that, like any other electronic equipment, they can and will become outdated or broken very quickly. Personally, I replace my cell phone every 2 years (if not more often), my computer every 4-5 years and other electronic devices within comparable times. If ebook readers became commonly used and thus a necessity, it would be an additional device to frequently maintain, update, and replace.
For one of its classes last year, UF's Law School gave students nooks to test out the viability of ebooks. I do not believe that they have continued this trend.
Unless a university embraces ebooks and their limitations (as mentioned above, the battery/electrical plug requirements, professor expectations, etc.), I do not see them becoming commonplace right now.
I think it will take more time for the e-book to become the most common textbook form used by students. Since many of us have already commented on how we like hold the book and write notes in the margins, a printable e-book may be what catches on first. One of my undergrad classes had the option of a printable online textbook for the semester. This worked out best for me, since it was the least expensive option and I could have a hard copy for the future. Having the option to print e-books would benefit those who like to have that paper and pen feel.
I really enjoyed the eBook article. I love to read for fun and I don't think I could every switch from the actually book to an e-book. For me personally I love going to the book store and buying a new book, holding the actually book and seeing how far I have gotten. The same goes for text books, I may still be that 1st grader at heart who loves to go back to school shopping, but to me buy my school text books helps me get into the back to school spirit. Plus who doesn't love buying school supplies!! I understand the pros of going to an e-book format including: cost, reduced weight for students to carry, less paper used and additional options they bring with them. However, I don't see this fad going into wide use anytime soon.
Emily makes a good point about the issues with the e-reader technology - updating and maintaing these devices are an added cost to students which only helps to drive the price of e-books up. As Emily noted and the author discussed, "Price, not format, is still the top driver of student textbook buying behavior..." I would agree with the author that the cost of e-books is the main reason why they haven't caught on as quickly as one might expect. If the decision was between a highly priced electronic copy of a textbook that would disappear in a semester or two, and a lower priced ink and paper version that I could have for years and years if I wanted, I know what choice I would make. And I think most college students are just as concerned with costs and expenses as I am. Until these e-books and their technologies become more affordable, I think they will continue to remain in the minority of textbook sales.
Wow! Unlike some of my classmates I am shocked in regards to the "Sex Week" article. I agree with Karen in tha tsex is stil a very tender subject, however in the manner that it has taken in this article, I feel a little uneasy. I am all for if the university of professors are not providing something the students want then we as students will go get it. But the somewhat sex conventions are well to me "too extreme." Its extreme to me in the fact that there is not much education going on at these eventsand thses events are not sensitive to other perspectives. If this happened at USF, we would definately be in the newspaper. If 'Sex Week" consisted of actual sex education on a college level form professors or instructors that were qualified (educationally) to teach than I am all for it. Talk about gnerational.. this is living and evident proof of such!
One of things I’ve liked witnessing since I was a freshman in undergrad is the growing access to more options when it comes to textbooks. The article “All in the Delivery”, illustrated the prevalent rise in available options to obtain course material. The article laid out the various possibilities, from traditional textbook buying to renting and electronic texts. The accessibility to more options definitely makes things more convenient for the student, so long as any one way is not insisted upon. The ultimate benefit of having so many of options is the flexibility to access the required reading however you choose. For some classes, it would seem more ideal to make the texts available in electronic form versus hardcopy, especially if a lot of the coursework that supplements the readings are dealt with on-line as well. I took a physics class that required a daily posting of answers to questions from the day’s lecture. If I had access to the textbook on-line or via an electronic version, I could have worked on those problems from any location with a computer, without the restraints of needing my physical textbook in hand. Yet, not being able to highlight and make my own paraphrased notes in my handwriting, would be harder for me to go back and really see what stood out to me when I review my texts. I guess I find that I prefer to read the hardcopy of any text longer than just a couple pages. I have trouble starring at a computer screen for long periods of time. I’d imagine using an iPad or other electronic text reader would be difficult to read an assignment of 50+ pages in one sitting, as it becomes extremely strenuous on one’s eyes after a few minutes using the computer screen.
In addition to the potential physical discomfort associated with reading an electronic text, mandating e-texts would be unrealistic from a financial viewpoint. Many students receive some form of financial aid to assist in the cost of attendance. If yet another expense were to be tacked on to the bill, the funding would need to come from somewhere. I agree with Emily and Caitlin, until these devices become more affordable, there won’t be much of a hike in sales. There is not a fervent call from students for more electronic texts, but a resounding cry to lower the cost of existing required texts. That is why I agree with the author, Mr. Kolowich, that we will likely see a continued rise in rental texts before we see any significant increase in e-text usage.
After reading the “Sex Week” article I can arguably agree with Aaron’s comments. The fact that sex education is being taught more and more at universities is not the issue to me. The issue that I have is the way that this sex education is being presented and taught at these universities. I don’t believe that having “sex-toy raffles and giveaways [and] workshops featuring graphic, violent pornography and simulated sex techniques” are part of sex education. If sex education is to be an important part of a university, then these universities should be bringing in information that is valuable to students such as practicing safe sex and practicing abstinence, and not offering “pornographic-film screenings; a lingerie show using college students as models; and a topless porn star demonstrating bondage, discipline, dominance, and submission to a student audience.” These ideas and principles that universities are portraying are not idealistic for sex education because I feel they are sending the wrong message. They are sending negative messages just so they can make profits off of the younger college audience.
I completely agree with Takiyah and Greg that having sex education events on campus should be left to well-educated professionals as opposed to sex toy vendors and the like. Some of you briefly skirted the reason as to why this may be occurring, but didn't go too much in depth. At the risk of opening a whole other can of worms, is it possible that the enormous disconnect between what is portrayed about teen/young adult sex in today's media and the lack of sex education during the middle/high school years is, in part, the cause of what is leading to some of these outrageous events on college campuses? Sex is a topic that should be talked about and certainly even before students reach college; however, I agree with what most of you said that it should be from a more educational standpoint. These events seem to be promoting promiscuous, unsafe practices rather than alerting students to the potential dangers of such activities. Student affairs professionals should definitely step in and make some drastic changes to these programs that are currently being offered.
On the subject of the e-books, I, too, love the feel of a real book in my hands. I think you all raised some excellent point about the pros and cons; however, it seems as if most of us feel there are more cons than pros. In addition to everything already mentioned, I also feel like an electronic device is much easier to forget, lose, leave behind than a big, heavy textbook. Students are notorious for misplacing items, spilling a drink on their cell phone or lap top, dropping something, getting rowdy and something accidentally breaks. Textbooks have stood the test of time. With the exception of fire or a hurricane, they can survive a lot of wear and tear. This is not true of these electronic devices, as some of you mentioned.
"Capture It" questioned whether it was an issue of sustainability, money, or both. I feel like as far as the issue of sustainability goes, the electronic devices are actually more damaging to the environment. While trees aren't being cut down, other valuable resources are being depleted. Textbooks can decompose over time, while electronic devices have components that are dangerous to sit in a dump and take much longer to disappear. In terms of money, I agree with what Huda said that it is initially an even larger investment for students. Plus, you then will need to replace this device over time, whereas a textbook you can keep for as long as you wish. It is unfortunate though that textbook companies revise their issues so frequently to make such minor changes. This brings in revenue for the company, but truly puts students at a disadvantage because they are less likely to be able to sell their textbooks back to the bookstore or be able to reuse them for another class that may use similar material. This is an issue that I don't think will be decided definitively anytime soon.
I find paradoxes rather intriguing. To me a major paradox is the fact that education is usually the first things to go when times get rough. However, without this access to education the whole of society suffers.
I understand that state is facing severe budget concerns, yet they decide on gutting the education system--in this case the University of Washington. Granted, the school has an enormous budget. One should forget though that it is the third largest employer in the entire state. Megan's right when she talks about the budget cuts of colleges everywhere, but why doesn't the government cut other things first like tax breaks for its most wealthy constituents, cut budgets for jails and prisons (for non-violent crime...), and other aspects of the budget?
2. In regards to the article about "Sex Week" I think it should be noted that university's are generally considered a bastion of freedom-- not only in action and creed, but in thought as well. However, I don't really think it is appropriate for companies that offer obscene material like these companies should have access to a university. The idea of an adult company sponsoring a fundraiser on campus just does not have a nice sound to it. Obviously sex education is considered something different, and is appropriate.
It makes logical sense that these companies are actively trying to market to and reach college students. This is a demographic that the companies feels they can entice into purchasing their products, and when any company finds such individuals they actively seek them out.
The article about e-books is a testament to new media having an influence in today's society. We are in an age where convenience is key, and if there are other options for owning books besides having stacks all over the place, people will jump on those opportunities that make it easier to access books. It is amazing how the technology that exists today (i.e. iPad) can hold a number of books within a small device. Who wouldn't want to have such a tool? However, for people, like myself, who like to write and highlight within their readings, taking the e-book route may be challenge. In the end, regardless of the decision professors make to switch completely to e-books or have a hard-copy hybrid of both, it should come down to the students since they are the ones responsible for having the material.
The situation taking place at the University of Washington is one that many state universities are facing. I remember my time at Rutgers. The university was in a process of completing a "Greening project", essentially a project that would give one of the five campuses in New Brunswick more of a traditional college feel (more green grass, landscaping, etc.). Due to budget cuts, construction was put on a hault, and the project has yet to be completed. On the other hand, residence halls are being renovated and remodeled completely which would tell people that Rutgers is not in a "money crisis". The example illustrated above and in the article show a trend that huge public universities are depending more on tuition revenue than ever before. When tuition rates are raised, it does affect the many students struggling to pay for a quality education. One might say that Financial Aid may the answer to tuition payment issues, but those funds are being cut as well. Also, they don't always cover the full price of tuition. To put everything in perspective, colleges are starting to become more business-driven than ever. They will do whatever it takes to keep their institutions running, even if it is at the cost of the students themselves. It is a growing issue that has yet to be rectified.
As an advertising major in my undergraduate work, we continually revisited the discussion of electronic media vs newspapers. For a while, it seemed like the newspaper might "go extinct" - and it still might. But the undeniable fact that we always came back to was that there is something about the tangible feel of a book - as Justin and many others mentioned, the turn of a page or the smell of the paper - that can never be replaced by an electronic device. I think eBooks could provide a more affordable outlet for students and certainly would help lighten the load of a heavy bag, but otherwise, I can't imagine that books will be entirely replaced by eBooks.
I particularly enjoyed the article about the University of Washington's funding issues that are arising. It seems as if schools in this position have completely lost sight of the student. In some cases, such as high research institutions, that might be somewhat forgivable. But, before too long, the University might find itself in a hole, with plenty of money (for research) but in the wrong account. I'm intrigued at the shift and wonder how the continuing downfall of educational dollars will shape the face of a student's experience (or lack thereof) into the future...
I personally do not think I would ever purchase an electronic book for a class. I like having the book in front of me and being able to highlight and make notes in the margins. I think that everything switching to electronic is unnecessary and totally eliminates any kind of college experience. I get the whole electronic thing for people who don't have time to make it to class, but I don't think it would ever work for me. I think a nook is a great idea for casual reading, but I don't like the idea for textbooks.
The sex week article is very interesting to read about considering I had no idea a campus would even offer that. Like pretty much everyone else who commented, I think promoting healthy, safe sex at universities is very important especially because the target age for STD's falls within the age groups of college students. To take it to the extremes of bringing sex toys and showing porns is unnecessary. Although I'm sure it grabs the interest of many students, it should be done and promoted else where. The basis for a program like that should be helpful to a students health not increase the amount of unhealthy sex going on at college campus's.
I agree with all the previous comments concerning ebooks. I do recognize the need in the marketplace to offer textbooks electronically, however the textbook industry is very well established and even though longstanding publishers are experimenting with textbooks as ebooks, the old fashioned book in hand, will not disappear. I am encouraged to see the comments shared by many of you about your appreciation for traditional books. I myself am a margin writer.
I didn’t realize that “Sex Week” at colleges were that crazy. I am all for providing an educational stance for sex to college students, and informing them on important topics dealing with sex, but I think the events discussed in the article may take it to far. Sex has always been an uncomfortable topic for many, but I think it is important for students to be educated about the topic and know the risks. I’m all for taking a more liberal approach for educating but having “Sex toy distributors, and pornographers show reels of pornographic films, and pictures of students on their Facebooks, using sex toys” is crossing the line and actually promoting internet pornography which is becoming a major problem among young adults today. These students will forever be on the internet and have to live with whatever consequences that may bring. If college campuses are going to have these “Sex Weeks” I think there should be some sort of administrative role, at least to give the final say. Yes as a society we have come a long way from the meager beginnings of sex in the media, and we need to embrace that, but I feel there is a more mature, and educational way to do so.
I first looked at the article concerning "E-Books" and thought that everyone would feel the same as I do, given that most of us are millennial students.
I love the technology of "E-books" and iPads and updating email to mobile phones. I believe that it makes most of our daily exercises much easier and we can use the time we save to spend more time assisting students or taking a much needed break from our work/studies. Personally I really enjoy reading a book electronically. The features that Brent brought up such as highlighting, marking, etc... have been addressed due to the many concerns with the software. In addition to those new features the iPad can search text! I find this feature incredibly invaluable when I am attempting to read a large textbook and I cannot remember exactly what page to find that analogy. Electronic books will also reduce the amount of textbooks we need to carry around daily. The wellness of college students depends largely on the weight of their bookbags and the distance they must carry that weight. In the future I do not see many students using books but rather switching to the fast paced "E-books" to compete with the other students that are using them effectively.
Here is an article that outlines some of the features of the kindle reader and iPad. It should be interesting if you are considering purchasing one of these tools. http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/reading-ebooks-ipad-ibooks-amazon-kindle-mac/
I agree with Andrea in the sense that I LOVE to read a book and have it in my hands. It just doesn't feel the same when I am reading from a book online. Yet, I do have to agree that we live in a time where the more technological something is, the more appealing it becomes. Students will gladly read online to avoid lugging around textbooks from class to class because it is, in fact, convenient. I think it is fascinating to see how these type of things have evolved since I have been in college and I am excited to see what else is to come.
Sex education is extremely important but not to that extreme. Lisa is right. College students are the target age for sexually transmitted diseases therefor it is necessary to educate them on safe sex but not to the extent in which was mentioned in the article. If anything, I personally feel like that promotes unsafe sex. But even if colleges were to promote some type of safe sex program, I feel like these "sex toy parties" will still happen.
The ebook article was great! I personally love ebooks as an option versus physical books. I have a kindle app for my iPhone, and it has done wonders to help in moments where I am waiting or not doing anything. I did way more recreational reading last summer than ever because it was just so convenient. I keep my phone in my pocket anyway, now I have books on hand at any given time as well. Personally, I want ebooks to take over. I do agree that they need to be cheaper. A book I can buy online for 99 cents used is way better than the 20 dollar ebook.
The article about the University of Washington illustrates what looks to be growing a trend for higher education. As the state budgets tighten, the priorities become highlighted as the cuts begin. State and local politicians don’t run for election/re-election on a platform of preserving higher education. When they say they are going to fight for better schools, the pictures with those campaigns are of cute little kids. It is going to be up to the universities to decide on their own budget priorities. The examples of flagship schools at the Universities of Michigan and Virginia being successful as they get lower funding from the state may not be reliable examples for other schools to follow. Each of these institutions has an exceptional reputation and is able to draw from a national pool of prospective students. As they raise tuition rates, students will not stop applying.
The article about e-books and whether it would catch on or not caught my attention because of the debate of which is better "books or e-books?" This debate has raged for the last 10 years when e-books first came into play. I am a fan of technology and I love to see what new gizmo gadget is going to come out next, but some things will catch on with the universal world and some things will be diamonds to a few. I believe the e-book will just be a diamond to a few.
Nothing against e-books; I'm sure if I was bored in traffic and had an e-book I would be compelled to read it if it is was in the palm of my hand. But, point blank it would first not be safe and second hurt my eyes. I know some people vouch for the Ipad and other types of electronic books, but I think the majority of people would agree nothing beats the real thing. People like holding paper in their hands and reading off the page. They like turning the page themselves and being able to take down notes on the margins of the pages. And for this reason I think e-books will never catch on. I believe there will always be an audience for e-books, but to catch on and take the place of a paperback is highly unlikely.
Great articles Becca! I thought the Washington University article was interesting. The concept of public universities privatizing is intriguing, especially since the U of I, my undergrad institution, just welcomed its biggest class ever and about half of the class comes from a state other then Iowa. No one on our campus called it “privatizing”, when we were recruiting this class last year we just said we were “expanding our recruiting efforts” (the University of Iowa draws a lot from the Chicago suburbs and Texas, but last year our counselors traveled to Colorado, California, and even overseas). It’s kind of crazy to think about state Universities depending mostly on students for their funding. We spent last week learning about land grant universities that were meant to serve the public, but at what point do we stop calling these schools public? Can we really still say they are serving the state if 1/3 to ½ of the students are coming from outside of the state? And are they really serving the students if the students are funding most of the university budget?
As for the E-Books...please no! I still like having a text book to highlight, underline, and put post it notes all over (despite the cost).
I personally enjoy the ebook concept and will agree with those who like the idea as well. I am however what you would call a tech geek, and I love the concept of only carrying one device with me wherever I go. The convenience of having a book at the push of a button, for half to price, is very interesting to me. I do like the option of highlighting in my text book, but the ipad (which would be my gadget of choice) is so user friendly, with many options to edit and arrange text. People are able to highlight, make notes, create outlines, add pictures and copy and paste right from the text.
I think requiring an ebook is too far into the future, but the cost is something that drives me to consider it as a real option for students. My only drawback is the same thing with having a computer in class. If students have their text books on an ipad, that also has the ability to access the web and other various applications, are they going to be focused on reading or more tempted to go and explore other features of the device. (I know my ADD kicks in occasionally and I would be tempted to stop reading to check facebook).
As an office we are considering investing in ipads to create a more interactive, quicker check in experience for first-year students who attend orientation. Having examples of text book students will need, interactive maps of the campus, videos, pictures and everything in between for students to view, is a great feature the ipad brings. I think overall, technology like this is great for a college campus and it has many possiblities. It just depends on the individual if that type of technology is something that you could benefit from.
1) Call me old fashioned if you will, but I can never see an e-book replacing the good-ole'-fashioned paper textbook for me. In fact, for years now it seems that people have been preaching the doom of textbooks. While e-readers are certainly becoming more affordable and usable, it's still not the norm for the average student to arrive on campus with their e-reader in hand. While increasingly becoming rare, students still arrive on campus without a computer, more without a laptop. I find it a hard sell that e-readers are going to be the "must have" item when coming to college the way a computer/laptop has become. Electronic books are not a new idea and they've been around for longer than the current day e-readers have been. It seems since the invention of the internet people have been expelling the fall of print materials and I can still go to the library and pick up a copy of Harry Potter. Online textbook outlets haven't pushed out the overpriced campus bookstore, so the paper book certainly isn't going to be pushed out by something like e-books. Don't get me wrong, e-books are great and if a student can use that option to save some money, that's good for them. Just give me the ISBN so I can buy the paper copy on Amazon.
2) Not a lot of people seem to be commenting on this article, so I will throw in my quick 2 cents. Does anybody else feel that Washington could be replaced with Florida? Having been a student in Florida, it seems like these are many of the same problems I see here. I think USF and many of the Florida institutions have weathered the "great recession" well (or at least better than others), but the same pressures and problems plaguing the Washington school are evident here. Florida schools (already with low tuition) begged to charge "differential tuition" to make up for falling state dollars, but increasing tuition only goes so far. Programs like Bright Futures are on the verge of being disbanded and universities seem to be left holding the bag. The mandate seems to be: admit more students, raise more money (cough... Unstoppable campaign... cough...), or lay people off (lower quality). USF is trying the first two options in an effort to stay afloat, but if things don't improve soon we might see even more drastic action as USF loses focus on its education goals and focuses more on making some cash.
3) I think the concept of "sex week" seems like a good idea, but like any program it needs to be monitored to make sure it keeps to the purpose of the university setting (education and critical thought). If these "sex week" activities are nothing more than an excuse to watch porn and provide companies access to a student population, then what purpose does that serve to the student population? I feel like the "guide" or questions in the article were the perfect questions that should be asked in accessing the education merit of the programs.
I am surprised that university monies and facilities are going to the programming of these "Sex Weeks." Usually the more controversial stuff, like the showing of graphic porn, is reserved for private spaces/places and definitely does not carry sponsorship by the institution. The "Sex Week" activities sound like a bunch of malarkey to me. I think the question needs to be asked: "What are the purposes/intended outcomes?" It definitely doesn't appear to be an increase in sexual awareness, the expansion of responsible sexual knowledge or health information. It seems like a sex expo, designed to promote specific products, movies, porn stars etc...Partnerships between the schools' health and wellness programs, community programs like planned parenthood, and certified professionals would need to be included in order to merit the use of university funds.
I thought the U of Washington article was very interesting. It gave a lot of insight into the tension between the push for get-in-and-get-out 2-year college educations and comprehensive 4-year degree programs. This is an issue that is becoming more and more pervasive in higher ed as a whole. The point was made that "There's something wrong when you say, 'I don't want my child to get a 4-year degree'" (something like that). I agree. Especially in the context of the job-landscape of the state and country. We need to reevaluate the aims/desired outcomes of our educations systems (secondary and postsecondary) as a country, state, city, institution...
I have found a few articles that I think will start some great discussions. What do you all think?
ReplyDelete1. All in the Delivery
"With another summer ending, the time has come to ask the perennial question: Could this be the year higher education finally embraces the e-book?"
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/08/31/ebooks
2. Cuts Intensify Identity Crisis for Washington's Flagship Campus
"Washington's flagship university doesn't look like it has money problems. The picturesque campus, a blend of Gothic architecture and the lush greenery of the Pacific Northwest, draws more federal research dollars than any other public university in the country. And the University of Washington raised $2.7-billion in a recent campaign from its perch in this entrepreneurial city.
But cracks are appearing under the surface. The state is not paying for the many construction projects here, and severe budget cuts are now threatening quality at the university, particularly for undergraduates who are coping with larger classes and fewer research opportunities, one of the institution's core strengths."
http://chronicle.com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/article/Budget-Cuts-Intensify-Identity/124162/
3. 'Sex Week' Should Arouse Caution Most of All
"Sex-toy raffles and giveaways? Workshops featuring graphic, violent pornography and simulated sex techniques? Teaching about polyamory but not about monogamy or abstinence?
All those events have transpired recently on campuses across the country—perhaps unbeknownst to many parents, alumni, and even professors. As the word gets out about such controversial programs, university administrators must decide what kinds of sex-education programs should be offered to their students, and who should be teaching them."
http://chronicle.com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/article/Sex-Week-Should-Arouse/124152/
It's not any big surprise that sex is an extremely taboo subject more so now in the new millennia with our nations shift back to a more conservative stance. I must say I am also not surprised that there has been an outbreak of these types of events. If you censor something like sex, it won't be unknown to students they will just have to go to extremes to get the information they want. So on the campuses where the students aren't getting the information they want/need about sex from administrators and campus programs they will go to the extremes such as they "Sex toy events".
ReplyDeleteI believe it is vital that college administrators take a strong stance with this and offer the campus programs educating about sex. Obviously its what the students want and if the administration offers it they can control the information flow and insure that the information the students are receiving is accurate. They could ensure that there is strong educational background in the programs such as information about sex-trafficking awareness, safe sex information, etc.
E-Books have been the craze of the past year and just like the article said, the iPad has been the “most buzzed” about. I actually go back and forth on this topic. I own a Sony eReader and when I purchased it I loved it. When I was traveling I was doing a lot of reading and the convenience of having all of my books in one device was great. Even though electronic books are a convenience I still like to feel the weight of the book, be able to turn a real page, and be able to briefly skim to see how far I have to go until I reach the next chapter.
ReplyDeleteJust like the way I feel about my personal reading preferences, I think the same rings true for educational textbooks. There are pros and cons to each. The pros are easy to see. Students would be a lot happier if they can lessen the weight in their backpacks by only carrying one piece of equipment instead of 4 heavy textbooks. The electronics editions of the books would also be cheaper because they would be on a rental basis giving the students more money in their pocket. The fact that it is also new technology drives this generation crazy. Depending on the student they might not even look at the some of the outweighing cons. The books are only a rental basis, which means the books would disappear after a couple semesters. This doesn’t benefit the student that would like to keep their books for their major to use later in their careers (such as our CSA books). Being able to mark in the books by highlighting and making your own notes are doable on such devices, but it is not the same as if you were doing so in a regular textbook.
Many different Universities and Colleges are experiencing an increase in budget cuts from their states. This has been a continuing problem and seems to be getting worse. I have been reading a lot about this topic lately because conveniently it was one of the main topics in Dr. Conway’s readings from our book. In the book many researcher’s stated that the budget cuts have been harming multiple institutions. Several colleges have had to cut back and hire low salary teaching assistants for introductory classes. Also, all the introductory classes at big colleges have more than 100 students in them. The quality of learning is starting to decrease due to these budget cuts. I know from my personal experience I was taught by more teaching assistants than actual professors. The only time I had professors as my teachers was when I got into my actual major classes, which was not until my third year at school.
ReplyDeleteI also thought it was interesting that the article “Cuts Intensify Identity Crisis for Washington’s Flagship Campus” stated that many public universities are choosing to privatize because of the lack of money they are receiving. I didn’t realize that this was happening so frequently. In my opinion this is a bad idea because if schools keep deciding to privatize many people will not be able to afford to go to college with the huge increase in tuition and other expenses.
Megan
Karen and Justin I agree!
ReplyDeleteIn the Ebooks article, Joseph Esposito says
“We shouldn’t be dismissive of incremental gains by digital text...but we shouldn’t be looking for revolutionary gains.” I have to agree. Technology is great, but it does malfunction. A paper text book, hmmm not so much.
We have all these technological advances but the generation gap between most professors and students is significant. How would class go over if students were on their Ipads while professors were lecturing? Would it be a distraction for someone without one? Some students learn best by re-writing things, jotting down a key word, underlining it multiple times. I'm not sure that E-books would satisfy those needs.
Also,I remember buy back week at the book store and let me tell you, getting $30 back on a book you paid $70 for at the end of the semester was/is a big deal! Now, I use Amazon prime to order my text books, if you use a student email account you get free shipping on all Amazon Prime purchases.
What's the motivation in all of this sustainability or money? Or both?
The ebooks article interesting. I have been debating about the purchase of an ereader for quite some time, but I, like Justin mentioned, enjoy holding a real book, flipping a page, and adding that book to my collection (not that I do anything with those books besides let them collect dust). For an educational book I couldn't imagine not being able to mark, write, hi-lite, etc., as I read or as my professor lectures. I also know that my phone dies on my at the most inconvenient times. How many of use would like our ereader to die in the middle of cramming for an exam or in the middle of a chapter with no outlet available to plug in to? I do believe that cost will be the prime motivating factor when purchasing a book.
ReplyDeleteThe "Sex Week" article was news to me, although I did overhear a UE teacher mention something about possibly having a "Safer Sex" class at some point this semester. Not sure if this is what he was referring to but I can only imagine the response of some parents if these topics were introduced to their new college student during a mandated university course.
On a completely other note, I did find an article on CNN while reading news today regarding the topic that Jeff brought up about for-profit universities and problems with their degrees when going to another institution. Definitely interesting!
http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/09/02/for.profit.college.debt/index.html
Wow, that "sex week" article was something else! I can understand the desire of students to put on events about different sexual topics but porn actors and actresses showing how to use different sex toys seems a bit much. The funny thing to me was this stuff is happening at Brown and Northwestern. While I do not personally find these things offensive, I am defintely surprised that these events would be allowed at such high profile academic institutions.
ReplyDeleteE-Books? Can we not turn an actual page now? I thought the world was coming to an end with
I-phones. Do we really need the weather forecast while checking the score of the game and getting directions to your buddy's house? I appreciate that this technology exists and enables people to do incredible things but one of the last true american activities is reading a book. I know it is taxing (sarcasm) but I think we can all muscle our way through those heavy pages. Like Brent said, there is something fulfilling about having a tangible item to pick up and read, then add to your dusty archives never to be seen again :)
That was a really interesting article Brent! Another example of how imperative it is to educate incoming students on financial literacy (prevention over intervention!).
ReplyDeleteMegan, I also didn’t realize the dilemma many flagship and public schools are facing, leaving them to choose between going private or decreasing in quality. In my experience at a private institution, you didn’t see student groups or offices able to throw out a free t-shirt at every event, but there were no signs that funding was lacking. DePaul actually released a very detailed plan to expand its campus the year I graduated. Of course, I am still paying them, and they are already asking for generous alumni donations…
“‘Sex Week' Should Arouse Caution Most of All,” definitely struck me as surprising for the same reason Aaron said, that such events were held at very high profile institutions. I couldn’t help but scroll down to the end of the article to see what some reactions were, and they aren’t pretty. It is obviously a very controversial topic, but from a student affairs perspective, I think such events do need to have some administration regulation, especially if the university’s name is attached to them.
As far as ebooks and ipad's go I have to go ahead and disagree with all the negativity. I have also been pondering the idea of getting an ipad for quite sometime. I do agree with Brent that from an educational standpoint I cannot imagine not being able to highlight thinks in my books. But I'm sure there is a way to highlight in those things.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I was really excited to see that USF had the option to purchase them for the nook. If they had the option for the ipad, I probably would have considered buying them. Only for the following reason. CONVENIENCE. We are going to need these books in our professional careers, so we most likely will not be selling them back at the end of the semester. Thinking about what a pain it is to move, why would you want to add another box of stuff to the pile? Especially when all of the information can be stored on a computerized device. You will then be able to reference the book quickly and easily from the ebook.
Also, the ipad and nook are small and light devices. They can just be thrown into your purse (or backpack for men) and do not take up room around your house year after year to collect dust. I personally really like the idea of not lugging a million things around campus and feeling like my shoulder is going to break off.
Regarding the ebook article, I thought it was interesting that the author primarily attributed its lagging popularity to cost but our comments are more concerned about the physical characteristics of printed books (physical paper pages, weight, longevity). I also am not a huge fan of ebooks. I think that one of the most basic issues with ebook readers is that, like any other electronic equipment, they can and will become outdated or broken very quickly. Personally, I replace my cell phone every 2 years (if not more often), my computer every 4-5 years and other electronic devices within comparable times. If ebook readers became commonly used and thus a necessity, it would be an additional device to frequently maintain, update, and replace.
ReplyDeleteFor one of its classes last year, UF's Law School gave students nooks to test out the viability of ebooks. I do not believe that they have continued this trend.
Unless a university embraces ebooks and their limitations (as mentioned above, the battery/electrical plug requirements, professor expectations, etc.), I do not see them becoming commonplace right now.
I think it will take more time for the e-book to become the most common textbook form used by students. Since many of us have already commented on how we like hold the book and write notes in the margins, a printable e-book may be what catches on first. One of my undergrad classes had the option of a printable online textbook for the semester. This worked out best for me, since it was the least expensive option and I could have a hard copy for the future. Having the option to print e-books would benefit those who like to have that paper and pen feel.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed the eBook article. I love to read for fun and I don't think I could every switch from the actually book to an e-book. For me personally I love going to the book store and buying a new book, holding the actually book and seeing how far I have gotten. The same goes for text books, I may still be that 1st grader at heart who loves to go back to school shopping, but to me buy my school text books helps me get into the back to school spirit. Plus who doesn't love buying school supplies!!
ReplyDeleteI understand the pros of going to an e-book format including: cost, reduced weight for students to carry, less paper used and additional options they bring with them. However, I don't see this fad going into wide use anytime soon.
Emily makes a good point about the issues with the e-reader technology - updating and maintaing these devices are an added cost to students which only helps to drive the price of e-books up. As Emily noted and the author discussed, "Price, not format, is still the top driver of student textbook buying behavior..." I would agree with the author that the cost of e-books is the main reason why they haven't caught on as quickly as one might expect. If the decision was between a highly priced electronic copy of a textbook that would disappear in a semester or two, and a lower priced ink and paper version that I could have for years and years if I wanted, I know what choice I would make. And I think most college students are just as concerned with costs and expenses as I am. Until these e-books and their technologies become more affordable, I think they will continue to remain in the minority of textbook sales.
ReplyDeleteWow! Unlike some of my classmates I am shocked in regards to the "Sex Week" article. I agree with Karen in tha tsex is stil a very tender subject, however in the manner that it has taken in this article, I feel a little uneasy.
ReplyDeleteI am all for if the university of professors are not providing something the students want then we as students will go get it. But the somewhat sex conventions are well to me "too extreme." Its extreme to me in the fact that there is not much education going on at these eventsand thses events are not sensitive to other perspectives. If this happened at USF, we would definately be in the newspaper. If 'Sex Week" consisted of actual sex education on a college level form professors or instructors that were qualified (educationally) to teach than I am all for it. Talk about gnerational.. this is living and evident proof of such!
One of things I’ve liked witnessing since I was a freshman in undergrad is the growing access to more options when it comes to textbooks. The article “All in the Delivery”, illustrated the prevalent rise in available options to obtain course material. The article laid out the various possibilities, from traditional textbook buying to renting and electronic texts. The accessibility to more options definitely makes things more convenient for the student, so long as any one way is not insisted upon. The ultimate benefit of having so many of options is the flexibility to access the required reading however you choose. For some classes, it would seem more ideal to make the texts available in electronic form versus hardcopy, especially if a lot of the coursework that supplements the readings are dealt with on-line as well. I took a physics class that required a daily posting of answers to questions from the day’s lecture. If I had access to the textbook on-line or via an electronic version, I could have worked on those problems from any location with a computer, without the restraints of needing my physical textbook in hand. Yet, not being able to highlight and make my own paraphrased notes in my handwriting, would be harder for me to go back and really see what stood out to me when I review my texts. I guess I find that I prefer to read the hardcopy of any text longer than just a couple pages. I have trouble starring at a computer screen for long periods of time. I’d imagine using an iPad or other electronic text reader would be difficult to read an assignment of 50+ pages in one sitting, as it becomes extremely strenuous on one’s eyes after a few minutes using the computer screen.
ReplyDeleteIn addition to the potential physical discomfort associated with reading an electronic text, mandating e-texts would be unrealistic from a financial viewpoint. Many students receive some form of financial aid to assist in the cost of attendance. If yet another expense were to be tacked on to the bill, the funding would need to come from somewhere. I agree with Emily and Caitlin, until these devices become more affordable, there won’t be much of a hike in sales. There is not a fervent call from students for more electronic texts, but a resounding cry to lower the cost of existing required texts. That is why I agree with the author, Mr. Kolowich, that we will likely see a continued rise in rental texts before we see any significant increase in e-text usage.
After reading the “Sex Week” article I can arguably agree with Aaron’s comments. The fact that sex education is being taught more and more at universities is not the issue to me. The issue that I have is the way that this sex education is being presented and taught at these universities. I don’t believe that having “sex-toy raffles and giveaways [and] workshops featuring graphic, violent pornography and simulated sex techniques” are part of sex education. If sex education is to be an important part of a university, then these universities should be bringing in information that is valuable to students such as practicing safe sex and practicing abstinence, and not offering “pornographic-film screenings; a lingerie show using college students as models; and a topless porn star demonstrating bondage, discipline, dominance, and submission to a student audience.” These ideas and principles that universities are portraying are not idealistic for sex education because I feel they are sending the wrong message. They are sending negative messages just so they can make profits off of the younger college audience.
ReplyDelete-Greg
I completely agree with Takiyah and Greg that having sex education events on campus should be left to well-educated professionals as opposed to sex toy vendors and the like. Some of you briefly skirted the reason as to why this may be occurring, but didn't go too much in depth. At the risk of opening a whole other can of worms, is it possible that the enormous disconnect between what is portrayed about teen/young adult sex in today's media and the lack of sex education during the middle/high school years is, in part, the cause of what is leading to some of these outrageous events on college campuses? Sex is a topic that should be talked about and certainly even before students reach college; however, I agree with what most of you said that it should be from a more educational standpoint. These events seem to be promoting promiscuous, unsafe practices rather than alerting students to the potential dangers of such activities. Student affairs professionals should definitely step in and make some drastic changes to these programs that are currently being offered.
ReplyDeleteOn the subject of the e-books, I, too, love the feel of a real book in my hands. I think you all raised some excellent point about the pros and cons; however, it seems as if most of us feel there are more cons than pros. In addition to everything already mentioned, I also feel like an electronic device is much easier to forget, lose, leave behind than a big, heavy textbook. Students are notorious for misplacing items, spilling a drink on their cell phone or lap top, dropping something, getting rowdy and something accidentally breaks. Textbooks have stood the test of time. With the exception of fire or a hurricane, they can survive a lot of wear and tear. This is not true of these electronic devices, as some of you mentioned.
"Capture It" questioned whether it was an issue of sustainability, money, or both. I feel like as far as the issue of sustainability goes, the electronic devices are actually more damaging to the environment. While trees aren't being cut down, other valuable resources are being depleted. Textbooks can decompose over time, while electronic devices have components that are dangerous to sit in a dump and take much longer to disappear. In terms of money, I agree with what Huda said that it is initially an even larger investment for students. Plus, you then will need to replace this device over time, whereas a textbook you can keep for as long as you wish. It is unfortunate though that textbook companies revise their issues so frequently to make such minor changes. This brings in revenue for the company, but truly puts students at a disadvantage because they are less likely to be able to sell their textbooks back to the bookstore or be able to reuse them for another class that may use similar material. This is an issue that I don't think will be decided definitively anytime soon.
I find paradoxes rather intriguing. To me a major paradox is the fact that education is usually the first things to go when times get rough. However, without this access to education the whole of society suffers.
ReplyDeleteI understand that state is facing severe budget concerns, yet they decide on gutting the education system--in this case the University of Washington. Granted, the school has an enormous budget. One should forget though that it is the third largest employer in the entire state. Megan's right when she talks about the budget cuts of colleges everywhere, but why doesn't the government cut other things first like tax breaks for its most wealthy constituents, cut budgets for jails and prisons (for non-violent crime...), and other aspects of the budget?
2. In regards to the article about "Sex Week" I think it should be noted that university's are generally considered a bastion of freedom-- not only in action and creed, but in thought as well. However, I don't really think it is appropriate for companies that offer obscene material like these companies should have access to a university. The idea of an adult company sponsoring a fundraiser on campus just does not have a nice sound to it. Obviously sex education is considered something different, and is appropriate.
It makes logical sense that these companies are actively trying to market to and reach college students. This is a demographic that the companies feels they can entice into purchasing their products, and when any company finds such individuals they actively seek them out.
The article about e-books is a testament to new media having an influence in today's society. We are in an age where convenience is key, and if there are other options for owning books besides having stacks all over the place, people will jump on those opportunities that make it easier to access books. It is amazing how the technology that exists today (i.e. iPad) can hold a number of books within a small device. Who wouldn't want to have such a tool? However, for people, like myself, who like to write and highlight within their readings, taking the e-book route may be challenge. In the end, regardless of the decision professors make to switch completely to e-books or have a hard-copy hybrid of both, it should come down to the students since they are the ones responsible for having the material.
ReplyDeleteThe situation taking place at the University of Washington is one that many state universities are facing. I remember my time at Rutgers. The university was in a process of completing a "Greening project", essentially a project that would give one of the five campuses in New Brunswick more of a traditional college feel (more green grass, landscaping, etc.). Due to budget cuts, construction was put on a hault, and the project has yet to be completed. On the other hand, residence halls are being renovated and remodeled completely which would tell people that Rutgers is not in a "money crisis".
The example illustrated above and in the article show a trend that huge public universities are depending more on tuition revenue than ever before. When tuition rates are raised, it does affect the many students struggling to pay for a quality education. One might say that Financial Aid may the answer to tuition payment issues, but those funds are being cut as well. Also, they don't always cover the full price of tuition. To put everything in perspective, colleges are starting to become more business-driven than ever. They will do whatever it takes to keep their institutions running, even if it is at the cost of the students themselves. It is a growing issue that has yet to be rectified.
As an advertising major in my undergraduate work, we continually revisited the discussion of electronic media vs newspapers. For a while, it seemed like the newspaper might "go extinct" - and it still might. But the undeniable fact that we always came back to was that there is something about the tangible feel of a book - as Justin and many others mentioned, the turn of a page or the smell of the paper - that can never be replaced by an electronic device. I think eBooks could provide a more affordable outlet for students and certainly would help lighten the load of a heavy bag, but otherwise, I can't imagine that books will be entirely replaced by eBooks.
ReplyDeleteI particularly enjoyed the article about the University of Washington's funding issues that are arising. It seems as if schools in this position have completely lost sight of the student. In some cases, such as high research institutions, that might be somewhat forgivable. But, before too long, the University might find itself in a hole, with plenty of money (for research) but in the wrong account. I'm intrigued at the shift and wonder how the continuing downfall of educational dollars will shape the face of a student's experience (or lack thereof) into the future...
Ryan
I personally do not think I would ever purchase an electronic book for a class. I like having the book in front of me and being able to highlight and make notes in the margins. I think that everything switching to electronic is unnecessary and totally eliminates any kind of college experience. I get the whole electronic thing for people who don't have time to make it to class, but I don't think it would ever work for me. I think a nook is a great idea for casual reading, but I don't like the idea for textbooks.
ReplyDeleteThe sex week article is very interesting to read about considering I had no idea a campus would even offer that. Like pretty much everyone else who commented, I think promoting healthy, safe sex at universities is very important especially because the target age for STD's falls within the age groups of college students. To take it to the extremes of bringing sex toys and showing porns is unnecessary. Although I'm sure it grabs the interest of many students, it should be done and promoted else where. The basis for a program like that should be helpful to a students health not increase the amount of unhealthy sex going on at college campus's.
I agree with all the previous comments concerning ebooks. I do recognize the need in the marketplace to offer textbooks electronically, however the textbook industry is very well established and even though longstanding publishers are experimenting with textbooks as ebooks, the old fashioned book in hand, will not disappear. I am encouraged to see the comments shared by many of you about your appreciation for traditional books. I myself am a margin writer.
ReplyDeleteI didn’t realize that “Sex Week” at colleges were that crazy. I am all for providing an educational stance for sex to college students, and informing them on important topics dealing with sex, but I think the events discussed in the article may take it to far. Sex has always been an uncomfortable topic for many, but I think it is important for students to be educated about the topic and know the risks. I’m all for taking a more liberal approach for educating but having “Sex toy distributors, and pornographers show reels of pornographic films, and pictures of students on their Facebooks, using sex toys” is crossing the line and actually promoting internet pornography which is becoming a major problem among young adults today. These students will forever be on the internet and have to live with whatever consequences that may bring. If college campuses are going to have these “Sex Weeks” I think there should be some sort of administrative role, at least to give the final say. Yes as a society we have come a long way from the meager beginnings of sex in the media, and we need to embrace that, but I feel there is a more mature, and educational way to do so.
ReplyDeleteI first looked at the article concerning "E-Books" and thought that everyone would feel the same as I do, given that most of us are millennial students.
ReplyDeleteI love the technology of "E-books" and iPads and updating email to mobile phones. I believe that it makes most of our daily exercises much easier and we can use the time we save to spend more time assisting students or taking a much needed break from our work/studies. Personally I really enjoy reading a book electronically. The features that Brent brought up such as highlighting, marking, etc... have been addressed due to the many concerns with the software. In addition to those new features the iPad can search text! I find this feature incredibly invaluable when I am attempting to read a large textbook and I cannot remember exactly what page to find that analogy. Electronic books will also reduce the amount of textbooks we need to carry around daily. The wellness of college students depends largely on the weight of their bookbags and the distance they must carry that weight. In the future I do not see many students using books but rather switching to the fast paced "E-books" to compete with the other students that are using them effectively.
Here is an article that outlines some of the features of the kindle reader and iPad. It should be interesting if you are considering purchasing one of these tools. http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/reading-ebooks-ipad-ibooks-amazon-kindle-mac/
I agree with Andrea in the sense that I LOVE to read a book and have it in my hands. It just doesn't feel the same when I am reading from a book online. Yet, I do have to agree that we live in a time where the more technological something is, the more appealing it becomes. Students will gladly read online to avoid lugging around textbooks from class to class because it is, in fact, convenient. I think it is fascinating to see how these type of things have evolved since I have been in college and I am excited to see what else is to come.
ReplyDeleteSex education is extremely important but not to that extreme. Lisa is right. College students are the target age for sexually transmitted diseases therefor it is necessary to educate them on safe sex but not to the extent in which was mentioned in the article. If anything, I personally feel like that promotes unsafe sex. But even if colleges were to promote some type of safe sex program, I feel like these "sex toy parties" will still happen.
The ebook article was great! I personally love ebooks as an option versus physical books. I have a kindle app for my iPhone, and it has done wonders to help in moments where I am waiting or not doing anything. I did way more recreational reading last summer than ever because it was just so convenient. I keep my phone in my pocket anyway, now I have books on hand at any given time as well. Personally, I want ebooks to take over. I do agree that they need to be cheaper. A book I can buy online for 99 cents used is way better than the 20 dollar ebook.
ReplyDeleteThe article about the University of Washington illustrates what looks to be growing a trend for higher education. As the state budgets tighten, the priorities become highlighted as the cuts begin. State and local politicians don’t run for election/re-election on a platform of preserving higher education. When they say they are going to fight for better schools, the pictures with those campaigns are of cute little kids. It is going to be up to the universities to decide on their own budget priorities. The examples of flagship schools at the Universities of Michigan and Virginia being successful as they get lower funding from the state may not be reliable examples for other schools to follow. Each of these institutions has an exceptional reputation and is able to draw from a national pool of prospective students. As they raise tuition rates, students will not stop applying.
ReplyDeleteThe article about e-books and whether it would catch on or not caught my attention because of the debate of which is better "books or e-books?" This debate has raged for the last 10 years when e-books first came into play. I am a fan of technology and I love to see what new gizmo gadget is going to come out next, but some things will catch on with the universal world and some things will be diamonds to a few. I believe the e-book will just be a diamond to a few.
ReplyDeleteNothing against e-books; I'm sure if I was bored in traffic and had an e-book I would be compelled to read it if it is was in the palm of my hand. But, point blank it would first not be safe and second hurt my eyes. I know some people vouch for the Ipad and other types of electronic books, but I think the majority of people would agree nothing beats the real thing. People like holding paper in their hands and reading off the page. They like turning the page themselves and being able to take down notes on the margins of the pages. And for this reason I think e-books will never catch on. I believe there will always be an audience for e-books, but to catch on and take the place of a paperback is highly unlikely.
Great articles Becca!
ReplyDeleteI thought the Washington University article was interesting. The concept of public universities privatizing is intriguing, especially since the U of I, my undergrad institution, just welcomed its biggest class ever and about half of the class comes from a state other then Iowa. No one on our campus called it “privatizing”, when we were recruiting this class last year we just said we were “expanding our recruiting efforts” (the University of Iowa draws a lot from the Chicago suburbs and Texas, but last year our counselors traveled to Colorado, California, and even overseas). It’s kind of crazy to think about state Universities depending mostly on students for their funding. We spent last week learning about land grant universities that were meant to serve the public, but at what point do we stop calling these schools public? Can we really still say they are serving the state if 1/3 to ½ of the students are coming from outside of the state? And are they really serving the students if the students are funding most of the university budget?
As for the E-Books...please no! I still like having a text book to highlight, underline, and put post it notes all over (despite the cost).
I personally enjoy the ebook concept and will agree with those who like the idea as well. I am however what you would call a tech geek, and I love the concept of only carrying one device with me wherever I go. The convenience of having a book at the push of a button, for half to price, is very interesting to me. I do like the option of highlighting in my text book, but the ipad (which would be my gadget of choice) is so user friendly, with many options to edit and arrange text. People are able to highlight, make notes, create outlines, add pictures and copy and paste right from the text.
ReplyDeleteI think requiring an ebook is too far into the future, but the cost is something that drives me to consider it as a real option for students. My only drawback is the same thing with having a computer in class. If students have their text books on an ipad, that also has the ability to access the web and other various applications, are they going to be focused on reading or more tempted to go and explore other features of the device. (I know my ADD kicks in occasionally and I would be tempted to stop reading to check facebook).
As an office we are considering investing in ipads to create a more interactive, quicker check in experience for first-year students who attend orientation. Having examples of text book students will need, interactive maps of the campus, videos, pictures and everything in between for students to view, is a great feature the ipad brings. I think overall, technology like this is great for a college campus and it has many possiblities. It just depends on the individual if that type of technology is something that you could benefit from.
1) Call me old fashioned if you will, but I can never see an e-book replacing the good-ole'-fashioned paper textbook for me. In fact, for years now it seems that people have been preaching the doom of textbooks. While e-readers are certainly becoming more affordable and usable, it's still not the norm for the average student to arrive on campus with their e-reader in hand. While increasingly becoming rare, students still arrive on campus without a computer, more without a laptop. I find it a hard sell that e-readers are going to be the "must have" item when coming to college the way a computer/laptop has become. Electronic books are not a new idea and they've been around for longer than the current day e-readers have been. It seems since the invention of the internet people have been expelling the fall of print materials and I can still go to the library and pick up a copy of Harry Potter. Online textbook outlets haven't pushed out the overpriced campus bookstore, so the paper book certainly isn't going to be pushed out by something like e-books. Don't get me wrong, e-books are great and if a student can use that option to save some money, that's good for them. Just give me the ISBN so I can buy the paper copy on Amazon.
ReplyDelete2) Not a lot of people seem to be commenting on this article, so I will throw in my quick 2 cents. Does anybody else feel that Washington could be replaced with Florida? Having been a student in Florida, it seems like these are many of the same problems I see here. I think USF and many of the Florida institutions have weathered the "great recession" well (or at least better than others), but the same pressures and problems plaguing the Washington school are evident here. Florida schools (already with low tuition) begged to charge "differential tuition" to make up for falling state dollars, but increasing tuition only goes so far. Programs like Bright Futures are on the verge of being disbanded and universities seem to be left holding the bag. The mandate seems to be: admit more students, raise more money (cough... Unstoppable campaign... cough...), or lay people off (lower quality). USF is trying the first two options in an effort to stay afloat, but if things don't improve soon we might see even more drastic action as USF loses focus on its education goals and focuses more on making some cash.
3) I think the concept of "sex week" seems like a good idea, but like any program it needs to be monitored to make sure it keeps to the purpose of the university setting (education and critical thought). If these "sex week" activities are nothing more than an excuse to watch porn and provide companies access to a student population, then what purpose does that serve to the student population? I feel like the "guide" or questions in the article were the perfect questions that should be asked in accessing the education merit of the programs.
I am surprised that university monies and facilities are going to the programming of these "Sex Weeks." Usually the more controversial stuff, like the showing of graphic porn, is reserved for private spaces/places and definitely does not carry sponsorship by the institution. The "Sex Week" activities sound like a bunch of malarkey to me. I think the question needs to be asked: "What are the purposes/intended outcomes?" It definitely doesn't appear to be an increase in sexual awareness, the expansion of responsible sexual knowledge or health information. It seems like a sex expo, designed to promote specific products, movies, porn stars etc...Partnerships between the schools' health and wellness programs, community programs like planned parenthood, and certified professionals would need to be included in order to merit the use of university funds.
ReplyDeleteI thought the U of Washington article was very interesting. It gave a lot of insight into the tension between the push for get-in-and-get-out 2-year college educations and comprehensive 4-year degree programs. This is an issue that is becoming more and more pervasive in higher ed as a whole. The point was made that "There's something wrong when you say, 'I don't want my child to get a 4-year degree'" (something like that). I agree. Especially in the context of the job-landscape of the state and country. We need to reevaluate the aims/desired outcomes of our educations systems (secondary and postsecondary) as a country, state, city, institution...